I belong to a forum that generally chats about mommy related issues. Sometimes they speak about driver’s licences and domestic workers wages, but that no doubt, is another story for another day.
The one very contentious subject which keeps coming up is the vaginal birth versus a c-section birth. This one gets the guns smoking in no time.
No matter how the question is posed, or the reason for the start of the thread – and there are literally dozens – it always ends up the same way. Someone says something stupid, and then someone wants to give them a cyber-space bitch slap.
The conclusion that always seems to be formed is that c-section moms are judged for having c-sections – no matter how subtle the judgement. I am not an overly sensitive person and I to tend to tread where angels fear to go and all that, but I have noted that the more threads I read, the more apparent this feeling.
The reason for why you have chosen a c-section is always prodded, like there is something wrong with you and you need to defend yourself.
The c-section moms often explain the trauma of the birth process that they have been through. The risk to the baby. They make it clear, that they did not choose this route, but ended up having to have an emergency c-section. Usually they are bashfully apologizing “I tried natural but ….” I can almost hear the desperation in their voices. Pleading not to be shunned by the vaginal-birth crowd.
There are a minority – at last count two – but no doubt more who just have not commented who elected to have a c-section.
We have no history of complications. We chose not to go through a trial of labour. We consciously elected to have c-sections as our choice of birth method.
It was not chosen because we are “too posh to push” – it was chosen as a healthy method of bringing our baby into the world – alive – without limited (if any) risk to him or her.
At 8 weeks pregnant – first scan, I looked at my OBGYN and said “I’d like to have a c-section.” He said “okey-dokey” or something of that nature, and that was the end of the conversation.
I felt no pressure to defend my choice with him, and the choice felt very natural to me. We had the birth date set, and then the questions (almost accusations) started.
Some of my family thought there was something wrong with me. Why would I choose to have such a hideous invasive surgery done when I had a healthy v-jay just waiting to spring into action.
I felt quite strongly that for me, this was the safest route. The only risk I could ascertain would be carried by me – the mom. My baby – barring other complications – would come out of the birth process, pretty much risk free, subject to the correct EDD calculation (early c-sections clearly have their problems, but that is another subject).
I had Connor more than 8 years ago, and then I knew very few people who had experienced a c-section through choice – most were emergency or medically advised.
I had researched the topic and weighed up the pro’s and con’s of a vaginal birth versus a c-section. I was open to either at the beginning of my research.
As I looked and delved in to the subject, the decision to opt for a c-section had fewer risks for my child. There was also a good chance that my perineum would continue to separate my wee area from my poo area for eternity – which a vaginal birth could not guarantee, and listed as a possibly complication.
I had unfortunately read one too many reports of women who were experiencing serious problems in their nether regions following a vaginal births. I realized that it was not everyone, but there was a risk of trauma to my perineum tearing which did fill me with a bit of concern. Sure there are good tears – aren’t there always, but it was the bad ones that did raise my eyebrow a bit! Again, nothing could be guaranteed it was more wait and see decision making.
One of the main motivators for my final decision was the control aspect – the one that tipped the scales shall we say. I knew where it was going to be, I knew who would be there, I knew pretty much everything that was going to happen on that day.
The option with a vaginal birth is that there were a lot of “let’s wait and see how it goes” answers to my queries. Not having a list to tick off causes me huge anxiety, and stress. I need a list and I need a pretty ink pen to tick things off – that is the way I am programmed.
As time has gone by and I have gone through the process three times, the feeling of “attack” by the vaginal birth crowd is becoming more apparent. There really is a feeling of two camps on this issue. You are either for the one and against the other. There does not seem to be much in the way of fence-sitting on this subject.
Things started to bother me – as I became a little more jaded and maybe a little crabbier, and maybe a little more inclined not to suffer fools.
Vaginal birth was always referred to as “natural” while c-section was well, just a c-section. By one being natural, surely it would make the other “unnatural” …
The vaginal set seemed to laud the fact that they did not take drugs for the pain or preferred not to take any pain relief. They were really proud of it, and sort of announced it to all and sundry, like a Girl Guide equivalent of pain endurance.
I have yet to hear a vaginal birth mom say “listen it was so much fun, no pain, it was brilliant – my fanny feels great after that!”
At the end of the day they do admit that squeezing a +3 kilogram mass out of your v-jay-jay, no matter how cute the mass is, can get pretty sore. Even once the endorphins have worked their way out of your system, it is still pretty sore.
The labour preceding the actual pushing seems to be excruciating too, and I have seen many women lose thier sense of humour during the 12 – 36 hours of gritting thier teeth through that. They are always quick to say “it was all worth it.”
So why no drugs? And why is it a badge of honour to not take drugs or some pain relief?
There are a lot of things which are “natural” which are not good for you. Naturally occurring elements such as arsenic, mercury, lead, and cadmium are toxic in various concentrations to both plants and animals. No one seems to have a problem with avoiding those at all costs even though they are natural.
As humans there is stuff that happens to our bodies that are natural – teeth rot, we lose vision, we develop a bit of Alzheimer’s, we might even develop a bit of leprosy or gangrene if left out in the Amazon for too long. Rabies is pretty natural too last time I checked.
Medical advances has given us some wonderful options to prevent us going through all this rather excruciating trauma. Either taking anti-biotics (not natural) or having operations (not natural) to relieve us of this pain, or even to make our lives better seems to be the way to go, judging by the amount of time we spend at doctor’s offices.
And here is the rub for me …..
We do let medicine intervene in lots of things that make us feel better, or reduce our pain. But why – oh why – do women insists on going through child birth, which no one disagrees is really painful, without medication, and then announce it like it is a badge of honour that they let their fanny stretch to all time size without asking for pain relief!
If that same women went to the dentist and had a filling or root canal work done and opted to not have medication and then proudly announced it afterwards. Her family and all her friends would view her as a freak and have her committed to the nearest psychological observation clinic post-haste.
But all this birth and no drugs viewed as natural – puts all this pressure on soon to be moms to think that this is what they must aim for, anything less is well just not good enough.
I realize I am not being as eloquent as I should regarding this subject, but it is one of those things that baffles my mind, so I am just having a little vent here.
But tune in later as no doubt I will have a similar vent at a later date.